IWAS
Example
(copyright)
Title
Cedar Brush Creek to ‘The
Basin’
Name of
Walk
Great North Walk
Location
A part of the Great North Walk, mainly within
Nearest
Towns:
Wollombi, to the north or Wyong to the south-east.
Altitude
Lowest, Cedar Brush Creek, 60 metres. Highest, Walkers Ridge Road, 380 metres.
Map
(Topographic mapping preferred)

Sections 1 to 3
shown.
Published Topographic Maps Required/
Recommended
|
Map
Name |
Scale |
|
Doralong |
1:25000 |
|
Morisett |
1:25000 |
|
|
1:25000 |
Assessed Grade: 2.2
Special Notes (Useful cautions or salient advice for
prospective recreational walkers)
The Assessment
Process
Assessability (Describe why it is assessable)
It is
within an assessable zone as it is presently used for recreational walk as part
of the Great North Walk, a route spanning Sydney to
The track
has been in continuous use since 1988, with occasional diversions made when
there is forestry work or a high fire hazard.
There are no other factors that make it
inaccessible in normal conditions, although heavy rains may make it difficult or
inaccessible.
Sections Created (Describe the sections, show them on a map and
write why these were selected)
|
Section Number |
Section |
Distance (km) |
|
1 |
|
1.9 |
|
2 |
|
5.0 |
|
3 |
Basin
Track |
3.1 |
|
|
Total
Distance |
10.0 |

Map showing sections in colour appropriate for their grading (see notes below).
Section two
is principally along minor forest road, whereas sections one and three are on
narrow foot track. Section three could be made into two sections since it is
steep at the between the forest road and the basin track. However the steep
section is short, approximately four hundred metres in
distance, and there are no other discernable differences in grading in the rest
of that section, so the single section has been
maintained.
Assessment (Showing points allocation for each factor,
totals for each section, and appropriate colour
representing the grading)
|
Assessable
Factors |
Section 1 Points Allocated |
Section 2 Points Allocated |
Section 3 Points
Allocated |
|
Surface |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
Context |
2 |
1 |
2 |
|
Incline |
2 |
1 |
3 |
|
Width |
3 |
1 |
3 |
|
Totals |
9 |
4 |
10 |
|
Grading |
2.7 |
1.0 |
3.0 |
|
Colour on Map |
Pink |
Light
Yellow |
Pink |
Further Notes on Each Factor in each
section (Showing
the final calculation)
|
Grading for Sections 1 to 3 |
Distance
(km) |
Point x
Distance |
|
2.7 |
1.9 |
5.1 |
|
1.0 |
5.0 |
5.0 |
|
3.0 |
4.1 |
12.3 |
|
Totals |
10.0 |
22.4 |
|
Divide by Distance
of |
10.0 |
Grade:
2.2 |
Feedback on Walking Times (A framework for estimating walking
times)
Below is a
matrix available for other walker/ walking group providing feedback of their own
time spent on the route. Examples of possible results are included.
Their times
could be based on
Although IWAS does not estimate walking times,
this matrix will provide a pragmatic way of assisting future walkers of likely
times needed to complete their walk.
|
Oldest
Person-> Size of Group |
<15 |
<25 |
<35 |
<45 |
<55 |
<65 |
<75 |
Over
75 |
|
1 |
|
2.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3-4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5-6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7-9 |
|
|
|
|
3.5 |
|
|
|
|
10-15 |
|
|
Times
entered in appropriate box |
|
|
|
|
|
|
16-20 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4.0 |
|
|
21-25 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Over
25 |
|
3.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example
only
Positive Features (unrelated to IWAS assessment and grading but
an opportunity to point out positive features. There should be a word size
limitation to prevent ‘spruiking’).
Scrub turkeys, wallabies
Birdlife
Orchids and birds nest ferns
Eucalypt forests and rainforest
Picnic and camping facilities at ‘The Basin’
campsite.
Published References (An opportunity to refer to useful
publication, websites or other information sources.)
Other Assessment
Details
Date of
Assessment:
May 7 and 8, 2006
Weather Conditions:
Sunny, 22 C. maximum.
Name of
Assessor:
G McDougall
Contact
Details
Email: utravel@optusnet.com.au
Phone:
61.2.98103695.